The Adventures of Erlenmeyer Flask

My Photo
Name:
Location: Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Musings of a Christian on the nature of things.

Tuesday, July 04, 2006

Walking the Planck

This is part of a series of short stories. The first is The Transporter Trial. In re-reading the story I see I need to get some things consistent. Have fun picking out the inconsistencies (and mispelings).

I’ve always been fascinated by lava lamps. You know, the lamps with undulating blobs of whatever, heated by a light bulb, that rise and fall. I could spend tens of minutes watching my old lava lamp. If that entertains me so easily, it’s no wonder I could stare at the glowing deep blue wispy fuzz ball in front of me in the ground floor lobby of Q-Corp. The baseball-sized glowing ball floated inside the center of a one-meter diameter glass globe, which was mounted on one-meter tall stainless steel pedestal. The real fuzz-ball, a Bose-Einstein Condensate, actually resides in the steel pedestal. The glass globe is a fancy display device of what was going on inside the pedestal. At times the fuzz ball slightly elongates horizontally, then gently bounces back into its spherical shape. Sometimes I seem to influence its shape almost imperceptively if I walk briskly around the pedestal and suddenly stop. I couldn’t tell if it the changes in the condensate were really my imagination. It’s almost like it is watching me. I know others are watching me. The security guard keeps an eye on me. I will get strange looks from others passing by, going to the elevators coming back from lunch. But that’s normal for me.

“You like our trade-mark?” Peter asked as he approached me from behind, after one of my hand-waving exercises to see what the ball would do. I had not seen the famous Dr. Peter Stone for several months. In spite of all that was going on in his life, he looked well rested.

“Yeah, sort of like an expensive lava lamp.” I said.

“You won’t find this at Wal-Mart,” Peter chuckled.

“The condensate is bigger, have you gotten it colder in there?” I asked. I remembered the last time I saw this it was a golf-ball size.

“Very good, yes, we got it colder, that’s why it’s bigger.”

“But it’s absolute zero in there, how can it get colder?”

“Well, it’s not absolute zero, but it’s very, very close to absolute zero.” Peter sad.

“What do you use these things for, besides being an expensive lava lamp replacement for a corporate lobby?” I asked.

Peter smiled, “There are some mysterious things we’re doing with the government, but I can tell you that Cal-Tech and Carnegie-Mellon are putting together an arrayed gravity-wave telescope using these things to probe the structure of the distant, young universe. Lawrence Livermore Labs are building a hypersensitive seismometer.” Peter motioned, “Come, You wanted to see what products we have. I have a few interesting things to show you.”

“Lawrence Livermore, aren’t’ those the nuke people?”

“Yes.” Peter replied as we walked into the elevator. “They also work in the nuclear non-proliferation arena and are looking around the world at possible nuclear tests, especially with terrorist groups.”

“By the way, thanks for granting me an interview. I know you don’t give out many these days.”

“You’re welcome. You write fairly about me. You’re interested in what we’re doing and take the time to learn about the science in what we do, unlike many of the others. I’m not the fair-haired kid any more. All the news and science programs are passing me by. They couldn’t get enough of me before. The transporter trial backfired on me along with my divorce. Now I’m considered a crackpot. My ex has gotten the media wrapped around her little finger, as well as the majority of the Q-Corp stock holders.” Peter said, looking down. The elevator door opened.

We walked over to Peter’s corner office on the top floor. “So, there is going to be a big share-holder’s meeting in two weeks. You’re ex is plotting a coup da’ta. What do you think is going to happen?” I asked.

“She’ll win and kick me out, unless I can buy enough shares to get controlling interest, and my chances for that is extremely unlikely.” Peter said with remarkable candor. “All the banks and financial institutions have turned their backs on me since my identity is in limbo after the transporter trial. Unless I can pull a rabbit out of the hat, I’m done.”

“So what are you going to do?”

“Well, I’ve got an ace up my sleeve. I’m going to have a party Friday night where I’ll reveal the ace. I want you to come.” Peter said.

“I’ll be there. What’s the ace?”

“You’ll have to wait for Friday. But it’s going to be late, 11:30 at night. Can you make that?”

“Sure, I won’t miss it. You’ve got me curious. Any hints?” I asked.

“No hints. Just come. I think you’ll find it interesting. I want a fair reporter from the media, and you’re as fair as they come. Come to the lobby at 11:30. No later. You’ll be escorted here at 11:30 sharp.”

We entered Peter’s office. The floor to ceiling windows showed a hazy, smoggy, hot summer day in Atlanta. I could barely make out the downtown skyline through all the haze. Peter’s large oak desk sat diagonally in front the corner windows. His desk was clean, with a few items on top. Each seemed to have a purpose. One item that caught my eye sat on front of the desk. It was a polished rectangular granite stone, about 2 inches high and a foot wide. It had inscribed on it: 6.62606931128413 x 10-34. I had enough of a math science background to know this was an exceedingly small number. I figured it had to be “one of those science numbers,” like the speed of light or Avogadro’s number, but I couldn’t place it.

“What number is that?” I asked, pointing at the polished granite stone.

“That’s Planck’s constant. It’s used to describe the quantized amounts of energy in photons and other very tiny particles. Max Planck discovered it around 1900, and it is recognized the historical start of quantum physics. In my graduate studies working at CERN, I refined the constant to 15 decimal places. The staff at CERN made this plaque for me, saying this is Planck’s constant engraved in Stone, a play on my name. It’s sort of a lucky number for me, an immutable law of the universe, a number I live by, the basis for Q-Corp.” Peter Stone then motioned to the other side of the office, an alcove which had a couple of white leather couches sitting at right angles to each over, and a large low “coffee table” filling in the square made by the two couches.

“You wanted to know what we’re doing. I’ve got a few interesting things we’ve developed. Have a seat” Peter walked over to the table and motioned for me to sit down on one of the couches. On top of the table was a PC, a slot machine, various gadgets including a cell phone/PDA, and a white football helmet with the blue fuzz-ball logo on the side.

“You’re making sports equipment?” I asked, surprised, standing next to the table, looking down on the helmet.

“Try it on, this is one of our most unusual products.” Peter lifted the helmet up off the table and fit it onto my head, as if I was being coronated. It was comfortably padded, but it felt a little loose on my head. Peter picked up something that looked like a Palm Pilot or a pocket PC. He took out the stylus and tapped a few things. “Sit down on the couch. Relax, you find this interesting.”

I sat down and sank into the leather couch. It felt so good to get off my feet. It felt real good. The gnawing little headache I had today was gone. This couch does wonders. Peter tapped a few more things. It got very quiet. I was really enjoying this. Peter’s leather couch was feeling really comfortable. Noise canceling, I thought. This is even better than my Bose headphones. There was something about this noise canceling that was different, very different, I couldn’t put my finger on it. Then I realized the always persistent ringing in my ears was gone. Sweet. “Nice noise reduction.”

“I am going to play something, enjoy.” Peter said.

A clear melody played, sending a shiver down my spine. The music was so beautiful. Tears came to my eyes. I closed my eyes and flowed with the music. It was very familiar, I had heard it many times before, but I couldn’t remember the name of the melody. I didn’t care -- I was really enjoying this.

The music ended, I felt reenergized, refreshed. Peter tapped a couple more times and told me to take off the helmet. “Wow, that was great! You’ll give Bose a run for the money. When will you start selling these, and how much?” I took the helmet off.

“The price is $150,000, so you won’t be seeing these in these in Best Buy.” Peter said. “It’s not a sound system per se. Nothing came through your ears.”

“But I heard music.”

“You thought you were hearing, but I was playing the music directly into the audio part of your brain.”

“Amazing.” I remember what was odd about the silence. “That noise cancellation, you did that in my brain too. I have tinnitus, ringing in the ears. That was silenced too. Were you fiddling with other things too? I felt real good.”

Peter smiled and nodded. “This is a wireless brain sensor and stimulator. We’re able to map the audio portions of the brain, including some abnormalities such tinnitus, and actively cancel it as it plays the music. It’s not a cure, mind you; you’ll notice the ringing come back gradually. This also cancels pain, and stimulates some of the pleasure and well being areas of the brain. By the way, you recognize the tune I played?”

Instantly I recalled where I hear the music before, from an old TV series, “The theme music for Mash. I normally find it rather bland. You were playing with me there. You made it sound more interesting than it was.”

Peter laughed, “Yeah, sorry about that. I was tugging on the heart strings in your brain.”

“Cancels pain, makes you feel good, you must be selling these to medical clinics.”

“Good guess. These are going through FDA trials. But you’ll never guess who our first customer is.”

I looked blankly.

“The California State Correctional Department.” Peter said.

“Music therapy? Drug treatment?” I guessed.

“No, death row. The state of California is concerned about the cruel aspects executing its death row inmates. They stopped using gas, went to lethal injection, but they are worried that might have some painful aspects to it. This helmet allows the inmate to request their last music, puts them in a euphoric state, eliminates pain, and then terminates all brain activity in an instant. In trial runs with inmates without executions, just putting them to sleep, there have been some inmates that sought to terminate their appeals and die sooner if they are guaranteed the helmet at their execution.”

“Thank you for not terminating my brain activity.” I said, putting the helmet quickly back on the table. I see you have a slot machine.

“Yes, that is one of our hot selling items. We guarantee quantum randomness, no bias. We have an interesting history in gambling. We first got into in a few years ago after the big Powerball scandal.”

“Oh yes, I remember that. The balls were not so random. Several people figured it out and developed a strategy to make a tidy profit on purchasing large spreads of Power-Ball tickets.” I said.

“That’s right. That developed into quite a scandal. We had just patented the quantum random hardware and we pitched it to GTECH, who runs most of the lotteries, for a modest price we’d set them up with a new lottery system with an ironclad guarantee of uniform randomness. They bought the idea; we got our foot in the door and then the casinos in Las Vegas and Atlantic City followed in buying our slot machines. We’re everywhere now.”

“Quantum slot machines? Why? Is it really more random?”

Peter answered, “Well, it’s all how you market your product. We guarantee fairness by our utterly random quantum uncertainty processor. It cannot be hacked. For the gambler it means the house can’t bias the machine against you. For the casino it means there is no way the users can exploit any non-random features. It’s a win-win for everyone.”

“What do you mean by quantum random?” I asked.

“Quantum randomness is where we generate random number, or a series of random numbers, quantum mechanically. We generate a sufficient number of quantum events at the subatomic level that produces the distribution and range of the possible numbers we want. We can make the random distribution uniform, or behave in any of the well know distributions, such as Poisson or binomial. For GTECH, we provided the software to make a uniform distribution from 0 to 999,999,999 for their Mega Billions game. That means each number in that range has an equal chance of being generated. For slot machines, it generates a quantum uniform random distribution for each reel. This is a simple slot machine here; it has 3 reels with 5 symbols on each reel. Each combination has a one in 125 chance.”

“Hmmm,” I was remembering the little bit of quantum physics I read was thinking out loud, “Imagine putting a slot machine and a player in a sealed box. The player pulls the arm on the machine, through quantum processes it arrives at the pattern of oranges, cherries, lemons, etc. If the player and machine are sealed off, from those of us on the outside, there is a multitude of all possible outcomes happening all once, until the player comes out or we peer in.”

Peter smiled, “You’ve been reading to much pop-science. That’s a popularized view of the Copenhagen Interpretation.”

“Huh?” I asked.

Peter answered, “You’re statement is a typical view popularized by pulp science writers. There are at least three kinds of views to explain what happens during these weird microscopic random quantum events. The first view interpreting quantum physics was developed in Denmark, which is why it got its name, the Copenhagen Interpretation. Basically this view says that when a random quantum event occurs, all the possible outcomes of that event exist at that moment and keep existing until an observer from the outside looks, which forces one particular outcome to be resolved. You’ve heard of Schrödinger’s Cat?”

I nodded.

Peter continued, “Schrödinger’s Cat is a thought experiment to show how incomplete the Copenhagen view of quantum physics is. Suppose there is a quantum device, composed of a radioactive atom that has a 50% chance of decaying in one hour and a detector that detects the decay. That device will activate poison gas if the atom decays. We put that device and a cat in a box and seal it for an hour. We open the box at the end of the hour. Just before opening the box, we ask the question: what is the state of the cat? In popularized books it says the cat is simultaneously both alive and dead, until you, the observer, look in and force, by your mere observation, one outcome to happen. Schrödinger presented this as a thought experiment to show some problems with the thinking in quantum physics at that point in time. Quantum physicists today say that any sufficiently complex aggregate of matter will cause the microscopic quantum indeterminacy to be resolved. The cat is such a complex aggregate of matter, hence there will never be a weird state where the cat is both dead and alive.”

“So, this simultaneous quantum states isn’t real?” I asked.

“Oh they’re real. You’ll have simultaneous quantum states, such as a quantum bit being both 1 and 0 at the same time, but when it is observed, or interacted with, it will come out as either 1 or 0, but not both. So, when you pull the lever on the slot machine, the quantum random processor will have all the various outcomes actually existing at some brief period of time, but as the components of the computer system interacts with it, it resolves into one set of values that we observe.”

This sounded strange. “So what causes it to become one value?” I asked.

Peter answered. “That’s the big question, and there are several possibilities. One possibility is that it just happens, the many different simultaneous states becomes one, randomly, without cause. Take the atom in Schrödinger’s box. When the atom decays, it will do so without any traceable cause whatsoever. We can assign a probable outcome, but we can’t find the cause for it. In fact, there is no cause.” Peter paused.

“There is another possibility that’s going to sound stranger. Instead of the simultaneous states resolving into one event, it all happens. As the as the surrounding matter interacts the simultaneous states, reality splits into all the possible outcomes. Its not just the subatomic particle that splits into all the possible outcomes, but everything else too, the entire world and universe. In other words, as we observe it, all the possible outcomes split into different worlds, including us looking at the results. By world I mean a version of the universe. So, with our fifty-fifty atom decay, when we observe it, two of us along with everything else branches into two different worlds, each world identical with each other at that moment, except that in one world we see the atom decay, in the other world we don’t see the atom decay.”

Now that sounds weird, I thought. “These are virtual worlds of some sort, not two real ones where there are two real me’s.”

“These are two real worlds, with two real you’s and two real me’s, along with two real everyone else.” Peter answered.

“But which one is the real me?” I asked, puzzled.

“They both are the real you.” Peter answered.

I reached for the slot machine, pulled the lever and watched the fruit spin by on the displays. They settled on cherry, orange and bell. “So, the quantum random processor creates a series of quantum events, that works uniformly on selecting one of the five pictures in each of the three reels. Let’s see, that makes 125 different combinations. Since each combination has a possibility, there 125 worlds different worlds now, each with you and me looking at the slot machine display having the same conversation.”

“You got it.” Peter said. “And in one of the worlds you’d be remarking about the 3 bells and the slot machine lighting up with the jackpot notification.”

I pointed out the window, “And everyone else in the world goes along for the ride?”

“Yes,” said Peter, “and you and me also go along for the ride whenever a quantum event happens, anywhere in the universe, whether it be Las Vegas, inside the sun, wherever.”

“So there must be billions of you and me in all these different worlds.” I said.

“No.” said Peter, “You’re way under, it’s a stupendous number of you and me, and unimaginable numbers of worlds are splitting off all the time.”

“That’s the most ridiculous thing I’ve heard of.” I said. “That defies common sense.”

“Einstein’s Relativity defies common sense, but that doesn’t make it not true.” Peter answered.

I sat and thought for a moment. “Can we observe these other worlds?” I asked.

“Not that I know of.” Peter answered.

“Then how do you know this is true?” I asked.

“Because it answers some questions, solves problems that have been around for a long time.” Peter answered. “What are the chances for intelligent life to evolve out of the Big Bang when the universe started billions of years ago?”

“I don’t know.” I answered.

Peter stood up, “Here is where our wacko creationist and Intelligent Design people are right. What are the chances, at the beginning of the universe in the big bang, for the right proportions of matter versus antimatter to develop, for the nearly perfect uniformity of expansion, but not too uniform, for scores of physical parameters to develop that would lead to life, for the earth to form at the right distance from the sun, to have a moon just like ours that protects and churns the environment. I can list hundreds of fine tuning parameters, that if they were off by a hairs breath, life could not exist. Let’s say the odds are 1 in a billion, or one in a trillion, or one in ten followed by thirty-five zeroes. With the many worlds interpretation, worlds were spawned off in stupendous numbers. Most of them are very strange and uninteresting worlds, where nothing develops, not even stars and galaxies. But in a very few of those worlds, proportionately speaking, things do turn out just right for stars and galaxies, but even from those worlds, most of the splits will result in nothing leading to life, just stars, galaxies, even planets. But again, a small proportion of those worlds, things are right, that lead to life, and out of the worlds that split out of those, a small proportion leads of those lead to intelligent life.”

Peter sat down again, “So, by virtue of us being here, when the odds are staggering against us, gives very strong evidence that this many worlds interpretation is right.”

“So you don’t see any possibility for God in all this?” I asked.

“God? What on earth for? Who needs God when you’ve got the Many Worlds Interpretation? We’re free to make the world the way we want to, do what we want. Why, I’ve even found a way to manipulate the world splitting to my advantage.” Peter said.

“How can you?” I asked. “You said we couldn’t see the parallel worlds.”

“I’ll explain everything Friday. Come here Friday night, 11:30.” Peter looked at his watch. “I’ve got a meeting. I need to cut this interview short. Come Friday.” Peter stood up.

I stood up, “Thanks, I’ll be here. Oh, by the way, what is the third way?”

“What?” Peter asked.

“You said there are three kinds of ways to interpret quantum events. You listed Copenhagen and Many Worlds. What’s the other way?” I asked.

“Oh. It’s an option nobody takes seriously. The third approach is that everything is a fixed pattern, past, present, and future. No freedom, just a frozen pattern. Obviously that’s a dead end.”

“Oh, I see.” I left.

...


I suppose that all the few gentle readers that read this story have figured out how Peter discovered to manipulate the Many Worlds to his advantage. I did not. But even if I did figure this out, it went a direction I would not anticipate.

I left my house at 10pm. I did not want to miss this party, meeting, whatever. I arrived at Q-Corp at 10:30. I sat in the parking structure right next to the entrance in visitor parking. I turned on the radio to pass the time. Nothing much was on the news. I switched stations and picked up a local Atlanta talk radio guy. Callers were talking about how many tickets they bought for the Mega Billions Lottery and what they would do if they won tonight. The jackpot was at 110 billion dollars. The drawing was at 11pm. I remembered Peter saying the Q-Corp quantum random processor generated the jackpot number. Was Peter going to manipulate the worlds to win? How?

As I mused about this, I recognized an old Lexus pull in beside me. It was detective Dennis Granger of the Georgia Bureau of Investigation. Dennis looked right at me, smiled and waved. Dennis got out, I got out too.

“What brings you here.” I asked.

“I suppose it’s the same thing that brought you here. Dr. Stone invited me to a party about some sort of announcement. I was curious to see what he is cooking, so I came. You have any ideas what this is all about?”

“I don’t know. He said he figured out some way to manipulate quantum physics to get certain things he wants. My theory,” I said, “is that he’s figured out how to win the Mega Billions Lottery through some quantum physics voodoo.”

“Sounds pretty far fetched.” Dennis said. “But if he did, he could face a lot of trouble for fraud or insider information.”

“It’s almost 11. Let’s listen to the results. Here, get in.” I climbed in my car, Detective Granger climbed in the passenger side of my car. I turned on the radio.

“This is the Mega Billions drawing, with an estimated 110 billion dollar annuitized payout. Let’s get started. These are nine digits, and the first digit is… the first digit is, well folks, we seem to be having a slight technical problem. We’ll get started shortly. You know that the game pays for pre-K and the Hope scholarship, was well as conservation efforts.” There was a pause in the program. I grabbed an envelope and pencil. “I’m told that they solved the little technical problem and they are ready to begin. The first number is now coming up, six, followed by six.” I jotted the numbers down on the back of the envelope. The announcer repeated the numbers, I checked them on the envelope, then put it in my pocket. The announcer finished, “Thank you for turning in to the Mega Billions Lottery game.”

I turned off the radio; we got out of the car and walked to the lobby. The door glass turn-style doors were locked. The security guard let us in through the glass door next to the main revolving door.

“You gentlemen are here to see Dr. Stone?” the guard asked.

“Yes sir.” I answered.

“I’ll escort you up at 11:30 pm. You can take a seat over here.” The guard pointed to some padded benches nearby. I could see the pedestal that held the Bose-Einstein Condensate in the center of the lobby.

Others came in. A well-groomed man came in. He looked at his watch looked over at us, walked over and sat down next to me. “So you’ve come to the party too. I don’t know what Peter is planning, but it ought to be interesting. Peter wants us all to wait down here, I don’t know what for. My name is Fred Jake. I’m the Chief Counsel for Q-Corp.”

“I’m Earl Flask, with the Atlanta Casual Observer, and this is Dennis Granger, he’s with the GBI. Dr. Stone invited us both to the party.”

“I remember you both now. You reported on the Transporter trial, and Detective Granger, you’re the lead investigator. Peter may have thought he won the case initially, but he has paid dearly for that victory. He’s a great scientist, but he doesn’t see the consequences of his actions beyond the immediate moment.” Fred looked up at the woman approaching. We all stood up.

“Oh goodness, sit down. Fred, good to see you. Who’re your friends?”

“This is Earl Flask with the Casual Observer, and Dennis Granger with the Georgia Bureau of Investigation. They are guests of Peter. They were at the Transporter trail. Gentlemen, this is Barbra White, she is the head of information technology.”

Others came in as 11:30 approached. We stood, talking. Everyone seemed to be in a pleasant mood. Another security guard came in, “It’s 11:30, the party is in the executive conference room on the top floor.”

“Thanks Charlie.” Said Fred, “We can find our way there, we’ll take our guests with us.”

We all got into several elevators and rode to the top floor. I followed everyone into the conference room. Sandwiches, tarts, tortes, cookies, chips, fruit, bottled water, Coke, and various other sodas were arranged on the table. We gathered the food, talked, when the lights dimmed, the theme music from Mash started, and the large flat panel monitor flickered to life in the front. We all took seats in the black leather chairs around the room. Fred and Dennis sat on either side of me, Barbra across on the other side of the conference table.

I leaned over to Fred, “Is Dr. Stone a Mash addict?”

Fred turned and gave me a funny look, then, “Oh, you mean the TV series.” He shrugged his shoulders, “I have no idea.”

The music faded. Peter was on the plasma TV in front of us, smiling, looking as if he was looking around the room and at each of us. Everyone quieted down.

“Thank you all for coming tonight.” Peter’s image said. I was wondering why Peter wasn’t here at his own party. “I’m sure you’re wondering what I’m doing and why this video. Let me explain.

“I’ve been researching quantum physics for some time now. Many of you know there are various interpretations of the weird things that go on in quantum physics. The one I’ve been fascinated by is the Many Worlds Interpretation. For those of you who know this stuff, please bear with me as I explain it to the rest of the audience.” Peter gave a similar explanation that he gave me earlier in the week.

“I’ve found a way to manipulate the Many Worlds, to exploit it.” The room got very quiet. I saw Barbra from across the table. She leaned forward to listen. I thought I detected a hint of concern in her posture. “Tonight, I conducted an experiment with the Mega Billions Lottery. As many of you know, the jackpot numbers are generated using the quantum random processor developed at Q-Corp. It generates a number from 0 to 999,999,999, where each number has an equal probability of being generated. That means one trillion worlds are split off at that moment. One of those worlds has the number I selected as the winning number. I have gone to that world.”

“Peter, no!” Barbra blurted. There were others in the room that looked very agitated. I obviously was missing something. So Peter found out how to travel to the winning quantum world. What’s the big deal?

The image of Peter continued, “Some of you might be figuring out how I did this, but let me explain it to everyone. One great philosopher said you must loose your life in order to find it. That is the key to manipulating the many worlds. Tonight, one trillion of you and me were split into the one trillion worlds during the lottery drawing. What I’ve done is terminated myself in all the worlds except the one I got the winning number.”

I finally got it. I looked at Barbra, then Fred and the others. They were sitting stunned in disbelief. Barbra was on here cell phone, I could make out she had called security and was having them search for Peter.

“The only real question was how to terminate the nine-hundred ninety-nine billion, nine-hundred ninety-nine million, nine-hundred ninety-nine thousand, nine-hundred ninety-nine of me and just leave the one in the winning world. I thought of the transporter. That would work quite nicely, after all, I’ve been through it before, with the original of me terminated, it would work pretty much the same way.”

Barbra quickly said to into her phone, “Check for activity in lab three in the past hour. Send someone there. Now.”

“But that lab has been off limits to me since the trial, and it takes a crew to get it ready. Instead, I opted for the California termination helmet. I programmed my PDA to receive the results of the lottery off the Internet, and if I won, the PDA would announce I won and turn off the helmet. I’d be refreshed, energized, knowing I am in the world were I won. If I didn’t win, it would painlessly, without me being aware of it, terminate all my brain functions for good.”

Most everyone was silent. Barbra was still talking to security on her phone. I heard Dennis Granger speak into his phone, “This is Detective Dennis Granger with the GBI. I’m at the Q-Corp Office tower and there is a possible suicide going on at this moment. We need paramedics and officers on the scene immediately.”

Peter continued in the video, “I’m sitting in my office. The doors are shut. It is possible you all are in the same winning world that I am in now. In that case, when you enter you’ll find me alive. Most likely, you will find me dead. But if you find me dead, know that I am taking advantage of the winnings to make a better Q-Corp.”

The video ended, the Mash music resumed, the lights brightened. Barbra, Fred, Detective Granger dashed out of the conference room and ran to the Peter’s office suite. I was right behind. Barbra opened the door. We entered. The lights were dim. I saw a figure slouched at the desk. It was Peter, with the death helmet on. Dennis walked over to behind the desk, placed his fingers on Peter’s neck, waited a moment, and shook his head.

“I guess this isn’t the winning world.” I said.

Just then the phone rang on Peter’s desk. Fred stepped over and pressed the speaker button. “Hello?” Fred said.

“Peter!” shouted a voice on the other end, “Is that you? You’ve got a lot of explaining to do.”

Fred broke in, “I’m not Peter, Peter is not available at the moment. Can I help you?”

“Who’s this?” the voice asked.

“I’m Fred Jake, Chief Counsel for Q-Corp.”

“I’m Richard North, CEO of Gtech.” The voice continued. “Oh I see, Pete’s too chicken to talk to me himself, he’s having the company lawyer do the talking. I know you’re there Pete!”

“What’s the matter?” asked Fred.

“What’s the matter is that Pete won the whole stinking lottery, and the whole thing stinks like fraud to me.”

“What?” Barbra interrupted, “Peter won the lottery? The Mega Billions Lottery?”

Barbra walked over to Peter’s desk and looked at the PDA. Detective Granger walked next to her, they talked quietly looking at the PDA.

Richard continued, “As usual, right after the drawing our ticket transactions for the period are checked to see if there is a winner. Dr. Peter Stone came up as the winner. My people recognized the name and called me. I checked with my Chief Counsel, got him out of bed, to see if Pete’s playing and winning violated any agreements between our companies on this. So far we don’t see anything in our legal papers that bars employees of Q-Corp in playing the Lottery. But when the public finds out that winner of the biggest jackpot ever is the CEO of the company that makes the random processor that is the heart of generating the lottery numbers, its going to look very fishy. It looks very fishy to me. This is going to make my previous troubles with the power ball scandal look like a cakewalk.”

There was a long pause.

“Richard,” Fred finally said, “I think we can help each other out of this problem.”

“I’m all ears.” Richard said.

“First of all, Peter is dead.” Fred said.

“What?”

“Peter is dead. We don’t know the reasons, we just found just before you called. In fact we have a GBI agent with us who is investigating this.”

The phone was silent.

“From what I understand, the winner must personally come forward and claim the prize.” Fred continued. “So, what I propose, is that since the winner cannot, we keep this matter to ourselves, and the law enforcement agencies. We will cooperate with law enforcement, the Gaming Commission, and Gtech to see if fraud is involved. If there is any hint of suspicion, we’ll yank our processors out and pay for a replacement. I think there is a compelling public interest to keep this quiet, at least for now.”

Fred put the phone on mute, then said to Detective Granger, “Let me explain this to you after I’m finished here.”

“You think you can get a deal with law enforcement and the Gaming Commission?” Richard asked?

“Yes.” Said Fred.

“How?”

“I’m working that out right now. Let me call you back with the details.”

“Okay, call me when you have more details. Bye.”

Fred pressed the button to hang up the call. Then, “Detective Granger, I want to yank all our random processors from all the high stakes gaming devices. If it can cause someone as intelligent as Dr. Stone to commit suicide, thinking that in a parallel world life will be much better, think of all the other copycats that will follow. We need to keep this quiet, at least the real reason. Detective Granger, I know you cannot make promises on this, but could you pass on my concerns to your agency and to others who will be involved?”

“That seems very prudent.” Said Dennis.

Then Fred turned to me. “I know this is your chance for a Pulitzer. I want your word you won’t publish the real reason for Dr. Stone’s death. You can report about the death, but don’t make the connection to the suicide to the Lottery, especially the quantum nature of the Lottery. It may seem self-serving for me to say this, but really, I am concerned about copycat suicides. Once people hear about Many Worlds and winning Billions, there are going to be some that will commit suicide over it. I want to get all the Q-Corp quantum random processors out of the gaming industry.”

“Okay” I reluctantly saw the point. I didn’t like it, but I saw the point. Shucks, if any story was going to get me on the Drudge Report, this was the one. That’s why I waited a couple of years before publishing this story. No one’s interested now. It’s old news.

So why did Dr. Stone die, even though he won the Lottery? Barbra’s theory was that Peter’s code in the PDA had a bug. She worked with the GBI in investigating Peter’s PDA. They discovered that Peter wrote a little program in his PDA to scan Mega Billions Website for the live drawing update. Peter’s program was quite simple, it would read the results and check it against his lotto ticket number he chose. This would work fine for 99.999% percent of the numbers, but there is a handful of numbers that don’t look random to the to the lottery computer. These numbers include “000,000,000,000”, “111,111,111,111”, etc. There are other numbers, such as pi, 3.14159265358979323846…, e, 2.718281828459045…,. Then there are the physical constants of the universe, the speed of light, and Planck’s constant. The software engineers were concerned that the hardware might be malfunctioning if it generated one of these numbers. When the quantum random generator delivered lottery number, the computer would check it against the list of suspect numbers previously mentioned. If number matched on of the numbers on the list, the computer would put the quantum random generator through a series of tests, which would last for two minutes. The computer would output to the live website a series of dashes and commas, “---,---,---,---“ until the diagnostics completed. This had the unfortunate effect of delaying the live radio and TV drawing announcement, and caused Peter’s PDA program to pick up the characters “---,---,---,---“ and compare it against his selected Lottery number of “662,606,931,128” (the digits of Planck’s Constant), which were not equal. This was the first time the quantum random processor had generated one of those special numbers. Had Peter written his program to wait for a valid number on the Lottery Website, or just picked a different number, his program would have worked correctly.

It was ironic that Peter tried to manipulate himself into the winning world, only to get terminated by a logic error, and he purposely terminated himself everywhere else, if the Many Worlds Interpretation is true. If the Copenhagen Interpretation is true, Peter was both incredibly lucky and not lucky. But what do you do with the third interpretation?

Sunday, October 02, 2005

Roger's Story

Note -- these stories build on each other, starting with the earlier dates. The characters are completely fictional, even my blog profile is fictional. The first story is here.
[draft]

I parked in front of the small, single story house. It’s tan brick construction, narrow carport, looked like so many of these homes from this period. Most of the homes on this street were probably rentals. The yards were not kept up. This house had its lawn mowed.

I got out, checked the address again on the mailbox standing next to the driveway, and then walked up the driveway. I paused, sometimes people used the doors inside the carport as the “official door,” others used the front door. I decided to use the front door. I pressed the doorbell button. It didn’t seem to work. I waited a minute, and then knocked firmly on the door. In a few moments, it opened.

Roger Smith greeted me, “Hey.”

“Hi, I’m Earl Flask of the Atlanta Casual Observer.”

“Come on in.” Roger opened the door wide and stepped to the side. Looking at Roger close up, rather than in the witness stand at Peter Stone’s trial, I could see that Roger was in the prime of his life. He looked very fit. Not an ounce of fat. His handshake was firm and strong.

I walked in and stood in the entrance of a tiny living room. The sofa looked a little well worn, the wingback chair also looked well used.

“Come, have a seat.” Roger motioned to the wingback chair. I sat down and Roger sat down on the sofa. “My wife, Pamela, will be coming in a second. She’s getting some cookies out of the oven.”

“You guys didn’t need to do that.” I protested, “Especially considering the wedding you’re having tomorrow.”

Roger said, “It’s catered, it’s all taken care of, we’re having a big party. You’re welcome to come.”

“Thanks,” I replied, “I’d love to come.”

Pamela came in with a plate of cookies. Roger and I stood up. Roger said, “Pamela, this is Earl Flask, the reporter.”

“Nice to meet you.” Pamela put down the plate and held out her hand. I shook it. Pamela obviously wore a wig. She looked somewhat tired. The bloom of her youth had faded.

“Roger said you’re with the Atlanta Casual Observer. Never head of that before. We tried looking it up on Google. It didn’t come back with anything. Here, have a cookie.”

“Thanks.” I said. I took one.

We all sat down, Roger and Pamela sat comfortably close to each other on the sofa.
I continued, “We keep battling Google to include us in their search engine. It seems to be a loosing battle.”

I paused, then, “The reason I’m here is to hear your story about being the first person to be transported in history. You work at Q-Corp, don’t you?”

“Yes,” Roger answered, “I’m a lab technician. I hope to finish my college degree and move into an engineering job.”

“Roger, what was the process of selecting you to be the first person to be transported?”

“Well,” Roger started, “on June 30th, a month before being transported, my boss came to my work bench and said that Dr. Stone wanted to see me right away. I asked my boss why, but my boss said he had no idea. So, I dropped everything and went up to the top floor. They were all expecting me and I was led into Dr. Stone’s office. Dr. Stone and Rita, the company lawyer, were sitting waiting for me. When I entered, Rita got up and shut the door, then sat down. They both looked very serious. I wondered if I screwed up something and they were going to fire me.

“Dr. Stone said that they wanted to ask me something that was to be kept strictly confidential. I wasn’t to talk to anyone about this, except my wife, and she had to keep it quiet. I nodded, and then Dr. Stone told me about the transporter. The transporter project had been a secret project but now they were going public about it. They wanted to pick me to be the first person to be transported. Dr. Stone said before I was to give an answer, he wanted me to know some important things about it. He wanted me to know that the transporter would make an exact copy of me in the receiver 50 feet away, and then it would wipe out the original me. I asked if that meant I would be killed. Dr. Stone said that when I came out of it, I would feel the same. He said some people might say I was killed, but if I felt the same, looked the same, wouldn’t it make sense that I survived and was alive?”

Roger continued, “I told him that I didn’t feel like doing it. Then Dr. Stone said he would pay me 10 million dollars if I would do it. But there were some conditions. I would get 5 million dollars for just going in the transporter, and the other 5 million after Dr. Stone was cleared of murder charges. I said that changes everything. I asked what would happen if I didn’t make it out of the transporter, would Pamela get the money? Dr. Stone said she would, and the same conditions would apply, she’d get 5 million dollars if I died in the transporter, and the other 5 million when the murder charges go away or are dropped. Then I said I’d do it. That’s when Rita talked about it all over again, going through everything. Then she got out some papers for me to sign.”

I asked Pamela, “So what did you think when Roger told you?”

Roger and Pamela looked at each other, then Roger turned to me, “Well, I didn’t tell Pamela. I knew she wouldn’t go along with it, no matter how much Dr. Stone paid us.”

Pamela nodded.

I was surprised, “So, you didn’t say a word about it?”

Roger looked a little sheepish, “No, not a word. Pamela didn’t find out what was happening until the night after it happened.”

I asked, “Did Dr. Stone and Rita know this?”

“Yes, and they were okay with this.” Roger answered.

I said, “So, nobody knew, all this time up to the day of being transported. Then what happened on that day?”

“I got up that morning, just like every other morning, drove into work, went to my workbench. Dr. Stone came personally to see me and walked me back to his office where Rita was waiting. They asked again if I was okay with this and that I could back out if I wanted to, and ran through how I would be copied and the original of me would be eliminated. I said I’m okay.

“Then the company doctor examined me. Then I was led down to the floor the transporter was on. I had practiced with them the previous week so I was familiar with everything. There was a crowd of reporters. I climbed into the transporter, they shut the door, it got dark, I stood there for a few moments, then the room seemed to change, I was a little disoriented, they opened the door, and I stepped out 50 feet away from where I was before. The reporters asked some questions but I don’t remember what they asked. Then I was led off to see the doctor, he gave me a physical. He said I looked fine. Then they told me they just created a new bank account for me, had some bank official come in, had me sign more papers, and that they put 5 million dollars in it. Then they said to take the next month off. By this time, it was evening. The doctor drove me home and went into the house with me. That’s when Pamela found out what happened.”

“So, Pamela, what did you think, how did you react?” I asked.

“At first I thought Roger was in some big trouble.” Pamela answered. “Then when the doctor introduced himself and started telling me what happened, I was confused, it didn’t make sense. Then I finally understood and I was frightened and angry. I cried. They killed Roger and who was this man? Then Roger said it’s him and he held me, saying he was sorry. I asked him why did he do it.”

Pamela stopped; tears were in her eyes.

I asked Roger, “So why did you do it?”

Roger said, “I did it for Pamela. You see, we’ve had a rough marriage. We’ve only been married for four years. Two years ago I had an affair. Pamela found out after a month the affair started. She confronted me. Pamela told me to pack my bags; our marriage was finished. It was that night I realized I threw away something more precious than anything else. I told Pamela I was sorry, and I found a cheap motel that night. Over the next year we started all over. I romanced her and did everything to win back her heart.”

Roger stopped, all chocked up, and hoarsely whispered, “Pamela took me back. She forgave me.” Tears were streaming down Roger’s face. Then Roger’s voice came back, “I thought we had a new beginning. Then Pamela got cancer. Breast cancer. Cancer in both her breasts. She had a double mastectomy, radiation treatment, and chemotherapy. I saw this as a chance to help Pamela. Ten million dollars can do a lot in helping her. I’d gladly give my life for her in an instant. I can’t repay her love. She had taken me back after I was such a jerk.”

“Did you hear what happened with Dr. Stone and his wife?” I asked.

“Yes, I felt sorry for Dr. Stone.” Roger answered.

“Did it ever enter your mind that you’re not legally married to Pamela, and with all this money you could start a new life?” I asked.

“What! Without Pamela, I couldn’t do that. Without her I have no life!” Roger answered. Roger turned towards Pamela and put his arm around her. “When Pamela had the double mastectomy, she was devastated. She told me she lost her womanhood. I told her that was not so, she was much more beautiful than that, that I loved her now for better or for worse. Pamela is the love of my life. She is my life.”

I was crying, remembering my wife that died just over five years ago. The interview had ended.



Pamela and Roger’s remarriage was a big party. The Smiths had lots of friends over. They included me as if I was their lifelong friend.

Friday, September 30, 2005

The Late Peter Stone

[draft]

While Dr. Peter Stone was released a free man, Dr. Stone was not free from the consequences of his defense strategy. Judge Curtis Martinez recognized the immediate legal ramifications of the Q-Corp transporter and immediately issued a restraining order on its further use. The danger was under the ambiguous legal cloud where Dr. Stone had a mistrial; criminals could use the transporter to attempt to escape prosecution – with possible success.

The central issue was whether someone died when they were transported. Dr. Stone made it clear in popular articles that when a person walked into a transporter, a copy of that person was made in the receiver and moments later the original person was destroyed in a flash. From all of us who attended the murder trial, it appeared that Peter Stone was trying to force the issue for the state and society to accept his definition of life, at least where it came with the use of his transporter. In the trial, Dr. Stone tried to show that the life of the person was determined by the physical composition and state of an individual. Produce a reasonable operational facsimile of a person, then that facsimile was the real person especially if that was the only operating edition of that person.

Immediately after the trial, I was able to briefly interview Dr. Stone for the Atlanta Casual Observer. While CNN and the New York Times wanted to get Dr. Stone’s feelings about being set free, I was curious about what made Peter Stone tick. In the jostle and commotion immediately after the trial in the courthouse, I asked Dr. Stone one question, “What is life?”

Dr. Stone stopped dead in his tracks, turned, and looked at me. I could see him read my press badge. “You work for the Casual Observer? I’ve never heard of that paper.”

“Neither has anyone else.” I said with a wry smile.

“Well, of all the crowd here today, you’re the only one who gets it.” Peter answered. “That was the issue of the trial, not the circus trick I pulled at the last moment that everyone is going to talk about. What’s your name?”

“Earl Flask. An easy way to remember, you being a scientist, is that my full name is Erlenmeyer Flask, but I prefer being called Earl.”

Peter smiled, “You must have endured a lot of teasing for that name.”

“Yes.” I answered.

“Well, to answer your question, the essential feature of human life is brain activity, and more specifically, the neural interaction in the brain. I call it brain software. Life is running the brain software on the proper “hardware” that supports it – the brain. But brain software does not have to only run in a real human brain, it could run on anything that would support all the important software processes the brain.”

People were pressing in from all around. He pulled out his wallet, reached into it and pulled out a business card. “Call me in the next day or two. I’ll give you an exclusive interview.”

“Thanks!” I said.



The next day I called Dr. Stone’s office, got in touch with his secretary, and arranged an afternoon appointment. I arrived at the gleaming white and glass Q-Corp tower, with its cobalt blue fuzzy ball logo that overlooked I-75 on the northwest edge of Atlanta, near the Chattahoochee River. I walked into the lobby that covered the entire bottom floor. In the center stood a white marble pedestal that caught my eye. I walked over to the golden rail that circled the marble pedestal, which was waist tall. A glass sphere, which was a meter in diameter, rested on the pedestal. It was pitch black inside the sphere, except for a glowing cobalt blue fuzzy ball that was about the size of a golf-ball, floated in the very center.

“That’s a Bose-Einstein Condensate,” a voice said behind me said.

I turned and saw it was Dr. Peter Stone. “But while a Bose-Einstein Condensate is in there, you’re seeing a digital representation of what is inside the sphere.”

I looked at the sphere again. “What use are these things?”

“We’re finding all sorts of applications, from sensitive gravity wave detectors to observe cosmic events in distant regions of the universe, extremely sensitive seismic detectors which can detect a person walking on the other side of the earth, to capturing and stopping light. We’re producing micro chips with miniature condensates on them.”

Peter continued, “I’ve got pizzas being delivered up at my office. It’s sausage, mushroom, and green pepper with a fried egg on top.”

I was surprised, “How did you know that’s my favorite?”

“We do background checks on people we let in that might see sensitive information.” Peter replied. “I learned a few things about you and your paper. There is one mystery about you. Did you bribe your English professor to finally pass English composition?”

“No,” I answered, “No bribery necessary, she just felt sorry for me, seeing this class was holding up my graduation and I failed it several times before.”

Peter laughed. We rode the elevator to the top floor and walked to Peter’s corner spacious office. Looking out the windows I say the slowly moving Chattahooche was in view below in the midst of the pine and orange foliage. To the south, downtown Atlanta was crystal clear this autumn afternoon. The pizza was sitting on the credenza next to Peter’s desk.

“Help yourself.” Peter motioned.

I sat down into a soft leather chair with a slice; Peter also got a slice and slid into another leather chair.

I got my notepad out. “So, you must have carefully planned this first transport. What other things did you do?”

Peter responded, “Well, we knew whoever pulled the transporter switch could face murder charges. So I volunteered to do the dirty deed, and planned to do a self-transport as soon as possible. Our transporter is a prototype, we can only transport one person at a time, then we have to turn it around and get it ready to transport again. It would normally take a week. I figured I didn’t have that long. We cut corners but got it ready in two days.”

I reached for another slice of pizza, “You must be in legal limbo right now. Legally, are you now Peter Stone? What did you do to get ready for your situation today?”

“You’re right, there were a lot of potential legal ramifications. Since transporting involved destroying the original copy of me, and the courts could rule that I had died and the me coming out of the transporter wasn’t me, I had to do a lot of legal maneuvering. I signed over the power of attorney of Q-Corp to my chief legal counsel, who then signed it back to me. On personal things, my wife inherited all what I owned or held in joint ownership. We’re going to get married again this afternoon so that I will be officially her husband again, and get legal ownership of our property.”

I saw the picture on Peter’s desk of a pretty lady. “Is that your wife?” I asked, nodding at the picture. “She’s a very beautiful woman.”

“Yes, Judy is beautiful, and thanks. We met at MIT. I was finishing up my doctorate in physics, she was completing her PhD in business at Sloan.” Peter replied.

I scribbled more notes in my notebook. Peter got another pizza slice.

“Did you worry about the morality or ethics of transporting someone, considering that you were making a copy of the person and destroying the original?” I asked.

“Morality is mumbo jumbo of irrational religious bimbos.” Peter flashed. He looked up. “Sorry, I’ve tangled with religious fundamentalists who’ve been pushing their agenda on me. I didn’t mean to be offensive.”

“No offense taken.” I said. “I guess with what you’ve said about life the other day, there is no objective grounds for morality.”

“Precisely. Morality is tied up with the myths of our culture. These myths and the associated taboos and expected behavior provide a structure for all of us to operate within. We’re growing in our understanding about the universe and life, and so some of our taboos and expected behavior need to change accordingly. Life is tied to our brain software. Copy and preserve that, with some common sense, and you’ve got the potential to really advance in some cool ways. With the transporter technology, we can augment life.” Peter was excited.

“So, the qualities of trust, love, …” I paused.

“The most objective point of morality is enlightened self interest. Love is both a software state of the brain that produces a sense of euphoria, but also in the long term helps you advance your self-interests, such as your state of happiness, sense of accomplishment, and other important states in your brain software. It means taking a long view on things, forgoing some immediate pleasure now for greater long-term gains in the future. It’s a mutual agreement to accomplish things that individually neither of you can accomplish on your own.”

“Wow, that’s a romantic Hallmark sentiment.” I chuckled.

Peter laughed, “Yeah, I didn’t impress too many young ladies with this kind of talk. Judy was different. She saw this too. We view life clear eyed. Not many couples do.” Peter looked at his watch. “Oh, we’ve got to wrap this up, I’ve got to go to my wedding in a few minutes. Hey, you want to be a witness?”

“Sure,” I said, “I can’t pass up this historic romantic moment. But I don’t have a wedding present.”

Peter laughed again. “Just write a good story for the Observer.” He pulled out his cell phone and punched a number. Peter spoke into the phone, “Hi John, is Judy there?”

Peter listened to his phone, his smile vanished, and his color drained from his face. “I don’t understand.” Peter said. Peter listened more, he face turned red. “Damn you John, you were supposed to take care of everything, not screw it up like this. What kind of jerky friend are you?” Peter jumped up from his chair and heaved his cell phone with all his strength across the office. It shattered against the wall.

“What happened?” I asked.

“John, our personally attorney, has run off with my wife. Judy refuses to marry me and is kicking me out of my own house!” Peter was steaming. “Damn it, Judy was encouraging me to go on the transporter so I would escape the legal difficulties. She said she and John would take care of everything. They sure did. All my stock, my homes, my cars, everything – they cleaned me out, all because I’m legally dead. I thought she loved me. I trusted her!”

I tried to comfort Peter, but he was fuming, throwing stuff all over his office, screaming and yelling. I decided it was time to leave. I drove home, typed my story and submitted it online to the Casual Observer. It was midnight by the time I was done. I dropped into bed exhausted.



I awoke from the sound of my cell phone next to my bed. 3 am! I answered it; it was Joe, my editor at the Casual Observer.

“Earl, get on the Internet now! Go to the Drudge Report. Your article is linked there. You’ve made it! You finally made it!” Joe hung up.

I jumped out of bed, opened the clamshell of the laptop, clicked to http://www.drudgereport.com/. It took 20 seconds, but it seemed like an eternity. There it was, my article, the banner headline on Drudge, “Peter Stone’s Wife Refuses Remarriage.” I stared at it in disbelief. Now I will be noticed. The webpage refreshed, still showing the headline. I emailed my friends. I looked again at Drudge and my headline. It refreshed again – and it was gone! I clicked on my favorites and brought Drudge back up. My headline was gone! Replaced by the headline “Hurricane Zelda Zeroing in on Galveston”. My story was linked to Drudge for only 15 minutes, early in the morning. That’s it.

I went back to bed.

The Next Story.

Sunday, September 25, 2005

About Charlie

[This is a draft]

Five years ago today, I got a knock at the front door. I thought it was one of my friends coming by to try to cheer me up, but tonight I didn’t want to bother. I was in a real funk. The love of my life, my wife, had died just two weeks ago. Pancreatic cancer. Real quick, three weeks after her diagnoses she was dead.

I walked over to the door, flipped on the front light. I didn’t recognize the man at first. I hesitated, and then I placed the face. He was the guy at the abortion clinic demonstration that I wrote about for Atlanta Casual Observer. Charles Speerman. He was not your usual fanatical anti-abortion activist. He was an equally vocal member of the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA). He knew how to make lots of people mad at him. This was a guy without friends. I must have been staring out the window near the door for 30 seconds when I finally came to myself. Charles was looking right at me with a quizzical look. I opened the door and invited him in. He stepped in, holding a tiny kitten, cradled in his arm, asleep. In his other hand carried a duffle.

“Earl, I am very sorry about your wife.” Charles said quietly.

“Thanks,” I said, looking at the kitten.

Charles took a big breath, “I have a big favor to ask you …”

“Oh no, not one of your rescued animals from the pound. No, please, I’m dead tired, I can’t care for an animal.”

“Earl, please listen. You need a distraction from your life right now as much as this kitten needs someone to care for him and love him.”

I shook my head.

Charles continued without noticing, “You will not believe the cruelty this kitten has gone through. It makes me sick and boiling mad. He needs a home. You need something to fill that empty void you have right now.”

Now I started to get angry, “What – a cat to replace my wife?”

“No, no – I’m desperate. I can’t keep him. But I know you’re a gentle person. You’re kind and gentle. This cat’s life is in danger. People are looking for him to do inhumane things to him.”

“What kind of things?”

“I can’t get into now. It will make you sick. Please, would you take care of him?”

I sighed, “Okay, I suppose so. But I know nothing about cats.”

“All the better,” Charles replied, “Because of what they did to this kitten, he will not have a normal life of a cat.”

“Oh great” I muttered.

“You don’t need to know anything about cats, just treat this kitten like it was your own child. Care for him, feed him, talk to him, love him.” Charles paused, then, “Look, here is a bag of stuff. Some blankets, several bottles and formula, hypoallergenic baby bath.” Charles put the duffle down.

There was an awkward silence. Then Charles said, “Earl, I can’t see you again. I’m in big trouble, if they knew you knew me, your life would be very difficult.”

“Who? Who is after you.” I asked.

“The less you know, the better. Don’t see me, don’t write me, don’t phone me, don’t email me, nothing.” Charles handed the kitten to me. It was warm and soft. I could feel it breath. It stirred slightly, and then snuggled into my arm.

“But I wrote about you in the Observer.”

“Yeah, but nobody reads it. No one will make the connection if you stay away from me.”

Charles turned and left, “Remember, you don’t know me. No matter what happens, don’t see me, don’t come looking for me.” Charles walked out to the street and disappeared into the night.

Great. A cat. I never had a pet before. I looked at the tiny kitten, snuggled in my arm. I walked over to the sofa and sat down. I rested the arm on my leg that held the kitten. I looked closely at the kitten to see if there was evidence of how it was harmed. The kitten was grey, its head seemed big, but I guess all baby animals have big heads in proportion to the bodies. The fur was even. I began to wonder where Charles got the cat. A science or medical lab? PETA always seemed to be rescuing animals from those kinds of places. Suddenly the movie Jurassic Park popped in my head. Could this be a prehistoric cat? A saber tooth? Would it some night, when it was hungry, come attack me in my bedroom and eat me? I looked at how tiny it was. Nah, that is ridiculous, I told myself.

Is it infected with some rare disease? My nose began to itch, my eyes watered. A tiny knot of fear edged into the back of my head. No, I told myself. Charles wouldn’t do that to me. I felt uneasy. No, I told myself again. Then it happened. Suddenly I felt something warm on my arm under the kitten. The warmth moved and grew. I panicked. I jumped up from the sofa with a yell and dropped the kitten on the cushion. In just a moment I realized what happened, the kitten peed on me – it wasn’t house broken. I felt foolish.

The kitten awoke with a start. It gave a long plaintive squeak that just kept going. I tried to comfort it; it just continued its plaintive squeak. I rubbed its head. It still squeaked. I talked to it, “there, there, I’m sorry.” Still it squeaked. Then, in the confusion, it somehow found my index finger and started sucking. Ah ha, hungry. I walked over to the duffel; dug around, found a small bottle and a pouch of formula. I fumbled to fill the bottle, finally put the top back on, and put it to the kitten’s mouth. It stopped squeaking and it started sucking. As it was sucking, I thought about what to name the kitten. Charlie came to mind. So I named the kitten after its rescuer.

My life revolved around Charlie for the next few months. His eyes finally opened during the week. I wondered if there were shut because of some disease. Phil White, a veterinarian friend, assured me this was normal, that this was a very young kitten. But after two months, I was getting worried about Charlie because he did not walk. He looked like a normal kitten. But he still nursed on a bottle, showed no signs of becoming house broken, didn’t meow (he’d make long wavering squeaks and wails), did not purr. I feared that Charlie was a retarded cat. But when I talked to Charlie, he’d open his eyes and look at me, which would make my heart melt. I would spend hours talking to Charlie.

After three months, Charlie still was not walking, he was still nursing, and still wasn’t house broken. He was moving his limbs and paws, but as much as I encouraged him to walk, he could not do it. He was beginning to crawl. One evening, I decided to call Phil, my veterinarian friend. He came over that evening.

“Where did you get Charlie?” Phil asked when he came in.

I told him the whole story and asked if he would keep it quiet.

“Of course.” Phil said. “Let me look at Charlie.”

I led him to Charlie’s bed in the living room. Phil gently picked Charlie up. Charlie started squawking. I spoke soothingly to Charlie, “It’s okay, this is Phil, You’re fine.”

Charlie looked into the eyes of Phil. Phil gently stroked Charlie.

“Does Charlie ever purr?”

“No,” I answered.

Phil gently put Charlie on the carpet, upside down. Charlie laid there, limbs dangling upward. Charlie gradually rolled over to the side. Phil picked Charlie up, dangled him about a foot above his soft bed, and then dropped him. Charlie landed on his back, startled. He began a plaintive squawk.

“Hmm,” Phil said softly, picking Charlie up, “Charlie doesn’t have many of the reflexes he should have by now. He doesn’t right himself.”

Charlie continued his squawk, looking over to me. I took him, cuddled him, spoke softly to him, “It’s okay, Phil wasn’t hurting you, it’s okay, shhh.” I gently rocked Charlie, gently talking to him; his squawk subsided, and then stopped.

Phil asked, “Where did Charles find this kitten?”

“He refused to tell me.”

“Let’s call Charles – I’d like to ask a few questions,” said Phil.

“We can’t. Charles told me not to contact him. I tried, but he’s moved out of Atlanta and has left no forwarding address.”

Phil sat thoughtful for a few minutes, then ask, “Earl, have you ever thought about putting this cat out of his misery?”

I was horrified, “You mean, kill Charlie? Never, no way!”

“Good, I was just checking on your attachment and commitment to Charlie.”

“Charlie’s a pain. I don’t know how to put it, but we’ve bonded, I’ll do anything for Charlie.” I said.

Phil paused, then, “How about you bring Charlie to my office tomorrow. I’d like to do a few tests and do a more thorough exam. And Earl, there is no cost, this is on me.”

I protested, but Phil was firm.

The next morning, I took Charlie to Phil’s clinic. Phil conducted a full exam. Took X-Rays on Charlie, took blood samples. Phil asked if it was okay to do a spinal tap on Charlie. I gave the okay.

The X-Rays were normal and the physical appearance was fine. But the reflexes and behavior were all weird, so unlike a cat. Charlie wouldn’t groom himself, didn’t show the playfulness of a normal kitten of his age, and wasn’t walking.

Phil said he’d call me as soon as he got some results. He had a few friends at some labs that owed him some favors.

Three days later, Phil telephoned me. I answered and he said, “Hi Earl, I’ve got some results, you better come in here.”

“What did you find out?” I asked.

“You better come here, I’ve got something, but I want to tell you in person,” said Phil.

I packed Charlie in his carrier and hurried to Phil’s clinic.

Phil greeted me and showed me into his office, showed me the chair at his desk. I sat down and took Charlie out of the carrier and put him on my lap.

Phil sat into his chair and leaned across his desk. “Let me tell you what I’ve found. Blood samples came back normal. No antibodies of any of the normal cat diseases. Charlie’s physical appearance is normal. Muscle tone seems to be a bit off, but nothing out of the ordinary. Whenever Charlie starts exercising, he should get the normal muscle tone. The spinal tap showed no signs of disease. No spinal meningitis. But, the lab tech found some neurons; it’s normal to find them. She decided to check for any abnormalities. This is where she found something.”

Phil paused and he took a big breath. “The lab tech found that the chromosome count was all wrong on the neuron cells. Cats have 19 chromosome pairs. These neuron cells have 23 pairs. She did other checks on the neurons. These aren’t cat neurons.”

Phil took a big breath, “These are human neurons. The lab tech checked the blood cells. These have 19 chromosome pairs; it’s cat blood cells. The brain and the nervous system are made up of human neurons.”

I sat and took this in. “Did someone implant a human brain in Charlie? He has a human brain?”

Phil answered, “I don’t think anyone surgically implanted a human brain like you’re thinking of it. There’re no surgical scars.” Phil paused again, then, “Have you heard of stem cells?”

I shook my head.

“Stem cells are undifferentiated cells often gathered from early embryos. They have the ability to change into specialized cells. My theory is that someone inseminated a cat egg, developed a cat embryo, and as the cells started to differentiate, they took out the proto-neuron cells of the cat embryo and replaced it with human embryo stem cells. Those stem cells blended into the embryo and became specialized neuron cells. The hybrid cat embryo, with human proto neurons, was implanted into a female cat that carried the fetus to full term. This was a sophisticated production. Someone was well trained, had good equipment. But this was illegal, unethical, and immoral. We haven’t heard about this missing cat in the news because the lab didn’t report it. What does a drug dealer do when his drugs are stolen? He doesn’t go to the police. I don’t think this lab has either.”

I was stunned, sickened all at once. “Why did they do it?”

“I don’t know,” Phil answered. “I don’t know of anything practical. If they wanted to test drugs on human brain cells in living creatures, mice would be a better choice. Maybe a scientist or a lab technician just wanted to see if he or she could do it. It would be pioneering research, but in the same vein that Nazis did pioneering research.”

“So Charlie has a human brain.” I said.

“I don’t know.” Phil said. “Charlie has human neurons, but I don’t know how these neurons will develop inside a cat fetus. This is a whole new game. But the fact the Charlie doesn’t behave like a cat at this point suggests that it could have some human like brain qualities. But I don’t know. The cranial capacity is not the same as a human. I just don’t know what to expect.”

I was sick. I was furious. I began to understand Charles’ anger that night.

“What do you want to do?” asked Phil.

“I don’t know. I don’t want to turn Charlie into a freak show. I want him to live as normal of a life, whatever that is, as is possible.” I said. “I don’t think I want to take this to the police or the authorities. At least not yet.”

“Okay, that’s fine. I’ve asked the lab tech to keep this quiet. She has agreed.”



That was five years ago. Charlie grew, learned to walk, learned to play his own way, and was house broken, learning to use the toilet. But Charlie does not preen or lick his fur to clean it, so I need to bathe him regularly. Charlie loves it. I’d read to him, play with him. One of Charlie’s favorite pastimes now is to look at the newspaper. He’ll paw through it, staying on various pages. He likes to watch TV. Charlie would unnerve guests with his uncat-like behavior. I taught Charlie how to meow and not to watch people as they talked – to be more cat-like with other people.

Because of Charlie’s peculiarities, I’ve been able to get some interesting news stories. So, besides my special trade secret of writing story of a court clerk’s son in a middle school football team to get preferential seats, I had another card or two up my sleeve with Charlie.

The Next Story.

I discuss some background to this story in my MataSchema blog, along with some musings on the subject.

Thursday, September 22, 2005

The Transporter Trial

[This is a draft. Details will change over the next few days. – the author]

Call me Earl. My birth certificate bears the name Erlenmeyer, Erlenmeyer Flask. I was born on April 1. My Dad, a chemical engineer with a warped sense of humor, suggested Erlenmeyer to my mother. She thought it sounded nice and so I got stuck with the name. During the early school years there was no problem, but as I got older, I was teased not infrequently.

I consult on various odd jobs in the computer industry to support Charlie and me. But my first joy is writing for the Casual Observer, a struggling Atlanta newspaper that should have closed its doors years ago, but somehow hangs on. If you haven’t heard of the Casual Observer, you’re not alone, neither has anyone else. They were the first paper to publish on the web, beating the San Jose Mercury News by a month. Once, the Drudge Report linked one of my articles, but only for 15 minutes. Poor Drudge was the victim of a hacker, and Drudge’s techies quickly fixed the problem. I get paid a percentage of the profits for each paper I have published articles – but since the Observer rarely has a profit, I’m rarely paid. When I’m paid, it’s peanuts. The owner/editor is constantly complains of my work. So why don’t I find another newspaper to work at? Three reasons. The first is that my editor is right – I am a lousy writer. I don’t know an adverb from an adjective, my verbs have declared all out war with my nouns, and I write in boring passive voice. Secondly, no other newspaper will hire me, even as an intern, even in the mailroom, even to clean toilets. Finally, I get press credentials with the Observer, which, with a little bit of moxie, a little bit of planning, is my ticket to all sorts of interesting places and events.

Oh yes, Charlie. Charlie is my cat. Well, that’s not accurate. No one owns a cat. Charlie is a different sort of cat, but then everyone views his or her cat as being unique. But Charlie is different. But this account isn’t about Charlie. It’s about Dr. Peter Stone, the CEO of Q-Corp, and the outcome of his murder trial.

Remember StarTrek? Remember the transporter in StarTrek? Peter and his talented scientists and engineers at Q-Corp built a transporter. A real, operating transporter. With great fanfare, Peter Stone personally flicked the switch and transported an employee through it, successfully. Peter hyped Q-Corp’s transporter in Popular Science the month before, which included details that troubled the District Attorney. In the Popular Science article, Peter wrote that transporting actually involved transporting the state of all the atoms of a person to another location – essentially recreating the person, and then quickly destroying the original person. The original had to be destroyed or else you’d have two identical people. Within a week of transporting the first human, the grand jury returned an indictment of first-degree murder against Peter Stone.

The trial was held in Cobb County, northwest of Atlanta. It was the biggest news in the county, ever. Q-Corp’s headquarters is located in Cobb County in the Galleria area near the crossing of Interstates 75 and 285. Its gleaming white tower stood overlooking I-75; with its cobalt blue fuzzy circle logo atop the building surveying the surrounding pine covered rolling hills. The logo, an image of a Bose-Einstein Condensate, symbolized Q-Corp’s business, applying quantum physics to practical business and consumer products. What is a Bose-Einstein Condensate? It is a small collection of atoms, trapped and chilled so cold and so close to absolute zero (the theoretical limit of how cold things can get) that they merge into one super atom. If you could see it, you would see a fuzz-ball the size of a golf-ball, or even colder, the size of a baseball. Q-Corp patented a way to put these condensates into relatively cheap instruments (cheap, if you’re a Fortune 100 company, or a well endowed university, or the Federal Government). Why put these into instruments? Well, that’s another story.

Dr. Peter Stone got his first PhD in physics at MIT. Peter is the epitome of charisma and one of the premiere evangelists of science. Where his peers would sneer at Popular Science, Peter wrote a regular column explaining the esoteric features of science to the unwashed masses, with a not so hidden agenda of promoting Q-Corp and himself. Peter was often seen on PBS science programs and specials, the talking head for any TV news event that needed a scientist, and a frequent witness at congressional hearings on anything technical. He was a smooth P.T. Barnum who promoted the Q-Corp big top.

I always sat in a front row seat in the spectator section of the trial courtroom, thanks to my Observer press credentials and a timely article I wrote the previous month. It was on the middle school football team that the court clerk’s son played on, and the vital leadership role he played on the team. I estimated the Observer’s circulation rose 10% on that one issue as the proud parents sent copies of the paper to all their friends and relatives. I actually got paid $3.47 for that article, the first payment that year, and the second highest payment for any of my articles. The Atlanta Journal, CNN and the New York Times reporters could not figure out why I got such preferential treatment over them. I wasn’t about to give away my few and precious little trade secrets I had. Throughout the trial I sat next to Detective Dennis Granger of the Georgia Bureau of Investigation, one of the principle investigators in the case. During the jury selection, Agent Dennis and I talked about the case and life in general during the breaks.

“I don’t get why Dr. Stone transported his employee the way he did.” I said to Dennis after the first day of jury selection. “It looks like Peter Stone begged to be prosecuted. With his public statements, his articles on the transporter, he painted a big bull’s eye on himself.”

“I know.” Dennis responded. “Peter is not stupid. I don’t know what his angle is.”

The defense and prosecution agreed prior to the trial to all sorts of facts. Peter flipped the switch that transported Roger Smith, an employee of Q-Corp, from the transporter transmitting station to the receiving station some 50 feet away. In doing this, a copy of Roger Smith was quantumly created at the receiving station in 250 milliseconds, followed by the rapid destruction of the original Roger Smith 20 milliseconds later. It all happened in an instant, in a twinkling of an eye. Peter premeditated this, knew better than anyone else what was happening. The real question the jury would have to settle, was Roger Smith actually killed in the process. Indirectly, they had to decide whether the person who identified himself to be Roger Smith was really Roger Smith, or just a copy of Roger Smith.

The prosecution brought several expert witnesses to the trial. The first was Dr. Frederick Martin, a medical professor and practicing physician from Emory University in Atlanta. He testified that since the original Roger Smith was destroyed, that constituted killing a human being. The defense tried to have Dr. Martin admit that the current Roger Smith had as much claim of being Roger Smith as the person did who entered the transmitter prior to being teleported.

“Dr. Martin,” the defense attorney asked, “Have you examined Roger Smith?”

“I examined the person who calls himself Roger Smith.”

“Did you notice the gunshot scar on his left arm?”

“Yes I did.” Dr. Martin answered.

“Did you ask him how he got that scar?”

“Yes I did. He said he got it ten years ago when hunting deer near Rome, Georgia.” Replied Martin.

“Did you check-out his story?” asked the attorney.

“Yes I did. Roger’s wife told me about the hunting accident ten years ago.”

“Dr. Martin, in your learned opinion, is this a genuine memory on the part of this man?” asked Peter’s defense attorney.

“Yes, it is.” Answered Dr. Martin.

“Dr. Martin, in your learned opinion, is this man’s scar a genuine scar?”

“Yes, it is.” Answered Dr. Martin.

“So, Dr. Martin, this man has a genuine scar with genuine memories associated with how he got that scar. He did not make this stuff up. He did not play act on this.”

“Yes.” Answered the doctor.

“So, this man has all the memories of Roger Smith, all the physical features of Roger Smith, including the scars of Roger Smith. So, he must be for all practical purposes, Roger Smith, wouldn’t you say?”

The prosecutor shouted, “Objection, your honor, the attorney is leading the witness.”

The defense attorney didn’t even wait for the judge to reply, but said, “I withdraw my question, your honor. I am through cross examining the witness.”

“A follow-up question, your honor.” The prosecutor said. “In your opinion, this man’s memory and scar would be the result of the transporter copying process?”

“Yes it would.” Answered Dr. Martin.

When the prosecution rested its case, the defense brought in four witnesses: Roger’s pastor, his primary care physician at Kaiser, his dentist, and Roger Smith’s wife. Each testified how the man who came out of the transporter receiver looked and acted identically to the man who had entered the transporter transmitter. The dentist even reported how the man had the same active cavities as Roger Smith had. Roger’s wife reported that the man who came out of the transmitter was physically the same, and behaved the same in every way as the Roger Smith did who originally entered the transporter.

Finally, the defense brought Roger Smith, or rather the copy of Roger Smith to the stand. He was asked how it felt to be transported (a slight disorientation because he noticed some features changed in the chamber he ended up in), and did he feel any differently from before (no, he felt the same).

The case went to the jury two days ago, and this morning we got word they had reached a verdict. I sat down in my usual front row seat, next to Detective Dennis Granger.

“What do you think the verdict is?” I whispered.

“I honestly can’t tell.” Answered Agent Granger.

“Peter Stone is sure taking a big chance with this trial.” I said. “If he wins, he can market the transporter. If he looses, he faces serious prison time.”

“We’ll see. I think he’s got an ace up his sleeve.” Dennis said.

We waited a few minutes, then the bailiff announced, “All rise, the honorable Judge Curtis Martinez is now entering the court.”

Judge Martinez slammed the gavel and announced the court is in session. The jury came in; all had serious faces and did look at Peter Stone.

“I think they have a guilty verdict.” I whispered to Dennis. Dennis grunted.

The judge turned to the jury and asked, “Have you reached a verdict?”

The foreman rose and answered, “Yes we have, your honor.”

“Hand the verdict to the bailiff.” The judge instructed.

The bailiff took the verdict sheet from the foreman and delivered it to the judge.

The judge unfolded it, read it silently, and then asked Peter Stone to stand.

The judge read: “Concerning the charge of first degree murder of Roger Smith, we the jury find the defendant, Peter Stone, guilty.”

There was an audible gasp from the audience in the courtroom.

“Do you have anything to say?” asked the judge turning to the defense.

Peter Stone’s defense attorney rose and said, “Your honor, in light of the verdict rendered on Peter Stone, I ask for a mistrial.”

Dennis muttered right beside me, “I knew it.”

“On what grounds?” Asked the judge.

“Your honor, two days after Roger Smith was transported, Dr. Peter Stone transported himself. I have witness and video that I can present to show this is the case. Since the jury has ruled that Peter Stone killed Roger Smith, thereby implying that anyone who comes out of the transporter is not the same person that went in. Peter Stone, by implication, died in the transporter transmitter and this person standing next to me is not Peter Stone. Therefore, this person cannot be prosecuted and convicted of the murder of Roger Smith.”

Pandemonium broke out in the courtroom. Reporters rushed out to send in their breaking news.

The judge slammed the gavel and shouted, “Order.”

“I will have to review the evidence you have before I can rule.” The judge bellowed.

It took a couple of hours, but Judge Martinez did declare a mistrial, and Dr. Peter Stone, or rather, the facsimile of Dr. Peter Stone, walked out a free man.

The next story.
Some of my thoughts about this are in my other blog, MetaSchema.

Monday, September 19, 2005

Purpose

This blog will contain a series of short stories involving the fictional character Erlenmeyer Flask. Erlenmeyer, who goes by Earl, is a sometimes reporter for the Casual Observer, a struggling fifth-rate newspaper. The stories will usually explore some topic (often philosophical) and touch on some bizarre implications.

These stories are an impressionistic sketchbook. Details have been left out, such as what the people look like. While my stories will inevitably reflect a word view, I'm afraid many will read into them things I have no intention to put in the stories. For instance, some might conclude I have a thing against large corporations, or executives. I don't have anything against them or for them per se. Nor do I think that the "common people" are superior or inferior to anyone. I have bigger issues to explore than these kind of things. I am fascinated with life, what it is, and what is going on in, around, and behind the universe.